Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is an excellent alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, that was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so if they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into the mouth area, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of regulations. Smok Novo 2 The reason being that while there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco in to the marketplace.
And also the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn implies that fewer people will purchase them.